WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: aria-relevant question

for

From: Lovely, Brian (CONT)
Date: Aug 10, 2017 1:17PM

Ah, OK. I'm not sure what they intend, as it's a partner site. I'm eyeballing automated results in order to clean out any false positives and I wasn't sure if this qualified or not. Sounds to me like this is a true positive. Thanks Bryan!

-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Bryan Garaventa
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 3:13 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] aria-relevant question

Sorry, I miswrote that, this combo is saying that both newly added nodes plus newly removed ones should both be announced, which is confusing. :)


Bryan Garaventa
Accessibility Fellow
Level Access, Inc.
<EMAIL REMOVED>
415.624.2709 (o)
www.LevelAccess.com

-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Bryan Garaventa
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:10 PM
To: Lovely, Brian (CONT) < <EMAIL REMOVED> >; WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] aria-relevant question

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]

Hi,
I've never seen this combination before, what is the author trying to do? Basically that combination is saying that newly added nodes should be announced as well as newly added ones, which would be very confusing.

The following section describes what each token value should do when applied if it helps:
http://whatsock.com/training/#hd25

(Which isn't to say that these combinations actually do this correctly in screen readers.)



Bryan Garaventa
Accessibility Fellow
Level Access, Inc.
<EMAIL REMOVED>
415.624.2709 (o)
www.LevelAccess.com

-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Lovely, Brian (CONT) via WebAIM-Forum
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 11:50 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: [WebAIM] aria-relevant question

An automated tool is calling out aria-relevant="additions removals" as incorrect, but I thought that was a valid value for this attribute. Is this a false positive or is "additions removals" an invalid value?


Brian Lovely
Digital Accessibility Team
<EMAIL REMOVED>




The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.