Thread Subject: Re: Basic questions

From: Brett, Thomas F
Date: Wed, Nov 15 2006 7:35 AM

• Return to this mailing list's archives
• View all messages in this thread
• Next message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Basic questions"
• Previous message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Basic questions"
• Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date

>Am I missing any product sub-categories here?

I do not see where Copiers or Fax machines would be in the categories
you have mentioned.

>For #2, require that all functions be able to be performed from a
>workstation (a particular user's workstation or one connected to the
>peripheral). This means that my screen-reader-equipped computer can
operate
>the printer/copier remotely, because all functions (including status
readout
>like empty paper trays) are exposed. This would be a significant step
>forward, and appears to be fully feasible.

Shouldn't there also be away the if the person could add paper if the
tray is empty?
To be access remotely from a person's work station would require that
the Copier/printer be connected to a network. This would mean that every
agency would be required to purchase network copier/printers instead of
stand-alone devices.





Tom Brett,
Section 508 Coordinator
US Office of Personnel Management
Rm 6H34A
2026061206 (v)
2026062582 (tty)
Disabled does not mean Unable
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jim Tobias
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 6:51 AM
To: 'TEITAC self contained/closed products subcommittee'
Subject: [teitac-closed] Basic questions

Hi All,

Please forgive me, but I feel that we're trying to make progress by
small
adjustments to the Standards but missing the larger picture. Here are
the
kinds of products I think we're trying to address:

1. appliance-type ICT, like calculators
2. peripherals like printers that don't typically have their own user
interface
3. public transaction terminals where the content or transaction is not
sensitive, such as a specially-configured PC used for access to a
library's
electronic catalog
4. public transaction terminals where the content or transaction is
sensitive, such as voting machine

Am I missing any product sub-categories here?

Let me propose a straw man.

For #1, grant an exception because suitable alternative appliances are
available. That is, don't require an agency to purchase only talking
calculators because it's burdensome and because talking calculators are
available.

For #2, require that all functions be able to be performed from a
workstation (a particular user's workstation or one connected to the
peripheral). This means that my screen-reader-equipped computer can
operate
the printer/copier remotely, because all functions (including status
readout
like empty paper trays) are exposed. This would be a significant step
forward, and appears to be fully feasible.

For #3, require the terminal to (a) support all accessibility features
native to the operating system the terminal uses and (b) provide either
permanently installed assistive technology functionality, or the use of
a
temporary installation of assistive technology. This means in (a) that
the
terminal basically running an operating system must permit users to
access
the OS features. In (b) it means the device must have been configured
with
AT (e.g. built-in screen reader) or permit temporary AT (e.g. screen
reader
on a flash drive, NCITS V2 network download of an alternate interface,
EZ
Access).

For #4, to what extent can we use the voting machine standards the way
we're
using WCAG and ISO for web and software? A lot of work has gone into
them,
and if certain sections can be adopted or adapted, why not do so?

***********
Jim Tobias
Inclusive Technologies
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
+1.732.441.0831 v/tty
skype jimtobias
www.inclusive.com

• Next message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Basic questions"
• Previous message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Basic questions"