Thread Subject: Re: "closed software"
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Randy Marsden
Date: Tue, Dec 19 2006 4:50 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Randy Marsden: "Re: "closed software""
- Previous message in thread: Peter Korn: "Re: "closed software""
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
My iPod description given in emails yesterday is one such example.
-Randy
>
> From: "Jim Tobias" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Reply-To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:55:58 -0500
> To: "'TEITAC self contained/closed products subcommittee'"
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >, "'TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee'"
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Subject: [teitac-websoftware] "closed software"
>
> In the discussion of closed products, we seem to be converging on the
> opinion that "closed" is a characteristic, not a category. In this context,
> software has been mentioned as potentially closed. Can someone please give
> me an example, or a further explanation, of what closed software might be?
>
> ***********
> Jim Tobias
> Inclusive Technologies
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> +1.732.441.0831 v/tty
> skype jimtobias
> www.inclusive.com
>
>
- Next message in Thread: Randy Marsden: "Re: "closed software""
- Previous message in Thread: Peter Korn: "Re: "closed software""
WebAIM is an initiative of:
