Thread Subject: Conference Call Protocol
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jim Thatcher
Date: Thu, Oct 12 2006 4:45 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: mike paciello: "Re: Conference Call Protocol"
- Previous message in thread: None
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
There were at least 30 messages between Mike, Jim, Bruce, Andi and Gregg
about maybe needing a meeting. There was no clear announcement of a call.
The phone number was in a message from Mike:
Re: [teitac-tools] Recommendation:CommunicationsTaskForceConferenceCall
I couldn't figure who was invited who wasn't. Then on request Andi provided
a link to the notes.
It seems like the process chould be cleaned up. Announce a phone call with
time and date - when it is over provide a link to the results. Or maybe I
should have "searched" the wiki for the notes? I am not wiki-savy.
Accessibility Consulting: http://jimthatcher.com/
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andi Snow-Weaver
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:54 PM
To: TEITAC Communications Task Force
Subject: Re: [teitac-tools] Recommendation: Communications TaskForce
>Unfortunately I was away this morning--by the time I got through the tons
mail all these lists are generating I missed the call. One of the few
disadvantages of being out west. Are there notes?
Debbie, here are the notes http://teitac.org/wiki/Tools_concall
- Next message in Thread: mike paciello: "Re: Conference Call Protocol"
- Previous message in Thread: None