Thread Subject: Re: Closure on something? anything?

Note

This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.

From: mike paciello
Date: Fri, Oct 13 2006 5:55 AM

I have to agree with you Bruce. Andi's contributions have been very helpful.
I'd like to second your motion to keep the subscription invitation open.
Perhaps we could acknowledge to the TEITAC committee members (via Tim's
email notification) that we have received significant contributions and are
looking for a couple of more members to round out the task force.

- Mike

_____

From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Bailey Bruce
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:28 AM
To: TEITAC Communications Task Force
Subject: Re: [teitac-tools] Closure on something? anything?


Below is the message, item 2 specifically, where I misunderstood Jim to be
recommending we remove the communication task force page from the Wiki.
Hence my rather bizarre clarification question to him on the call.
Obviously I should have re-read it at least once more!

I would actually like to argue for keeping the subscription invitation
available, at least to committee members. We have benefited significantly
from Andi's contributions, and I suspect she appreciates being kept informed
on our communications. I think we should extend the same courtesy to the
other committee chairs and conveners.




_____

From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jim Tobias
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:03 AM
To: 'TEITAC Communications Task Force'; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [teitac-tools] Closure on something? anything?


Hi All,

Well, I'm having fun; hope you are!

1. I propose that we limit calendar editing privileges to Access Board
staff, Mike, me, and the Subcommittee leaders/chairs/conveners. I certainly
have no objection to Jared, and it might seem arrogant and ungrateful to
exclude him, but I propose to do so for the sake of role clarification. Of
course, certain practicalities may intervene: Jared, is it even possible to
remove yourself as calendar admin?

2. I propose to not accept new members for the Tools task force. We're not
limiting input by doing so, as everyone is invited to suggest, advise, warn,
etc. If you agree we need to remove the listserv invitation from the wiki.

WebAIM is an initiative of:
Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) Utah State University