Thread Subject: Re: Communications Task Force Conference Call
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Fri, Oct 13 2006 7:30 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Communications Task Force Conference Call"
- Previous message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Communications Task Force Conference Call"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
That is what I remember. I think the chairs were added so that meetings
could be posted right away to avoid conflicts.
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jim Tobias
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:14 AM
> To: 'TEITAC Communications Task Force'
> Cc: 'Capozzi David'
> Subject: Re: [teitac-tools] Communications Task Force Conference Call
> Just a note on the TEITAC Google Calendar: In addition to
> Jared and myself, Mike, Tim, Bruce, and Dave Capozzi have
> editing privileges already. And we want to add the
> subcommittee chairs, right?
> Jim Tobias
> Inclusive Technologies
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> +1.732.441.0831 v/tty
> skype jimtobias
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bailey Bruce [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:24 AM
> > To: TEITAC Communications Task Force
> > Subject: Re: [teitac-tools] Communications Task Force
> Conference Call
> > Importance: High
> > > Tim, we'll be looking for your draft message to the
> committee today.
> > I understood the tasking to be rather in the other direction!
> > To that end, I have started a DRAFT:
> > http://teitac.org/wiki/Draft_from_Tools_ConCall
> > I left out a bunch of our recommendations, it is already
> long, and I
> > worry about the more important items being drowned out.
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Communications Task Force Conference Call"
- Previous message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Communications Task Force Conference Call"