Thread Subject: TEITAC communications group
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Bailey Bruce
Date: Fri, Oct 06 2006 2:22 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Bailey Bruce: "TEITAC communications group"
- Previous message in thread: None
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Testing the DL, apologies if everyone gets this message twice.
Please update the message subject line as necessary. This particular
sub-thread has no mentioned transcripts for several iterations. (And I
think I was the first person who neglected this detail.)
Access Board updates are live, notably:
http://www.access-board.gov/news/508committee-meeting.htm
http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/refresh/teitac1st/
Along with minor update to the usual:
http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/update-index.htm
Suppose Tim wants to send out an announcement regarding venue for the
next meeting. Does he have to send that out to nine different addies?
Mail sent to = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
<mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > only hits the committee
members and alternates, not the public who have expressed interest.
Could there be an alias like = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = that would hit all
ten (currently) lists, avoiding duplicates?
I do not think we need a separate announce list, although that may
simplify things. If John Q. Public wants only the meeting
announcements, well that's tough! Jon Q. Public should be contributing
to a subcommittee IMHO!
I think we need filters on the lists. That is, to send to any list, one
must be a member of that list. Only Tim or the chairs should be able to
send to = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = .
Is there a separate list for the eight sub committee chairs? If not, do
we need that?
Jared, I don't expect you to change anything mechanical with regard to
the "websoftware" groups you have already created. I just wanted to
highlight the concern for this group. Thanks again for your fine work.
Everyone here is thrilled with the site!
- Next message in Thread: Bailey Bruce: "TEITAC communications group"
- Previous message in Thread: None