Thread Subject: Re: revision of 24(e)

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Thu, Jan 04 2007 8:10 AM

• Return to this mailing list's archives
• View all messages in this thread
• Next message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: revision of 24(e)"
• Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: revision of 24(e)"
• Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date

We've been thinking that the requirement piece needs to be longer and
more fleshed out, so hadn't considered combining c/d with e as a result.
Please check out the proposed revisions and let us know if you still
think that combining these makes sense.

AWK

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Gregg
Vanderheiden
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:01 AM
To: 'TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee'
Subject: Re: [teitac-video] revision of 24(e)

This actually doesn't require them - just that any that are be permanent
or user selectable.

We might want to combine the two thoughts.

Require them and require that they be perm or user selectable (in one
guideline)


Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andrew
> Kirkpatrick
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:31 PM
> To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-video] revision of 24(e)
>
> Here's another way to skin this:
>
> Original:Display or presentation of alternate text presentation or
> audio descriptions shall be user-selectable unless permanent
>
> Proposed: Equivalents for video and audio shall be audible or visible
> (respectively) by default, unless a mechanism to enable the display
> exists.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Dave Singer
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:59 PM
> To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-video] revision of 24(e)
>
> The problem with removing "permanent" and saying something like
> "available to everyone" is that the definition of "available" is very
> vague ('oh yes, it's available, you just need to pay for this premium
> service, buy this tool, and then ...').
>
> The intent is that the entire caption stream or audio stream be
> presented without user intervention.
>
> The other comment I made was that this should say something about the
> end-user requirements to be able to turn captions on and off should
> not be materially different or more onerous than to recieve the basic
> program material ('you don't need a special television').
> --
> David Singer
> Apple Computer/QuickTime
>

• Next message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: revision of 24(e)"
• Previous message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: revision of 24(e)"