Thread Subject: Re: Draft Questions
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Diane Golden
Date: Fri, Jan 05 2007 11:20 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Deborah Buck: "Re: Draft Questions"
- Previous message in thread: Diane Golden: "FW: Draft Questions"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Wow! I would strongly encourge folks to read this article (albeit long) as
it provides an extremely coherent discussion of the challenges with current
Subpart A language along with how that relates to the technical and
functional implementation standards. It even provides some information we
have been asking for about bid protests, etc. that has never otherwise
From: Weinstein, Michael [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:41 AM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Subpart A Subcommittee
Subject: RE: [teitac-subparta] Draft Questions
I thought you would be interested in the attached article by Professor
Christopher Yukins of George Washington University's Government Procurement
law program. He formerly was a partner at Holland & Knight and he is a
mentor of mine. The article points out many of the challenges of
implementing Section 508 from a procurement prospective. Of particular
interest is the discussion on "best value" that reiterates some of the
points I have made regarding the current regulations.
Michael Weinstein, Esq.
Systems Research and Applications Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of
SRA International, Inc.
3434 North Washington Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22201
Email: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =