Thread Subject: Re: Paul Michaelis's topic

Note

This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.

From: Karen Peltz Strauss
Date: Mon, Jan 08 2007 2:35 PM

I think it is a mistake to get into this debate on a committee by committee
basis and am afraid it might bog down other discussions. I would
recommend it be taken to the full committee.

Karen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Debbie Cook" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "TEITAC Telecommunications Subcommittee"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [teitac-telecom] Paul Michaelis's topic


>I believe each of the subcomms is supposed to addres the themes to the
> extent feasible, so I would think that analysis of this should come from
> the
> telecomm committee for consideration by the whole.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Tobias" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> To: "'TEITAC Telecommunications Subcommittee'"
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:35 AM
> Subject: [teitac-telecom] Paul Michaelis's topic
>
>
> Paul just proposed that the Telecom Subcommittee discuss the economic
> impact
> of
> making certain features required under 508. As this issue is not limited
> to
> telecom,
> can I recommend that we move this discussion into the relevant Theme,
> "Economic
> Analysis", and therefore move it into the entire Committee's purview. Is
> that
> agreeable?
>
> ******
> Jim Tobias
> Inclusive Technologies
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> +1 732.441.0831 voice/tty
> skype jimtobias
> +1 908.907.2387 mobile
>
>

WebAIM is an initiative of:
Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) Utah State University