Thread Subject: Re: Paul Michaelis's topic
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Karen Peltz Strauss
Date: Mon, Jan 08 2007 2:35 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Brett, Thomas F: "Re: Paul Michaelis's topic"
- Previous message in thread: Debbie Cook: "Re: Paul Michaelis's topic"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
I think it is a mistake to get into this debate on a committee by committee
basis and am afraid it might bog down other discussions. I would
recommend it be taken to the full committee.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Debbie Cook" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "TEITAC Telecommunications Subcommittee"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [teitac-telecom] Paul Michaelis's topic
>I believe each of the subcomms is supposed to addres the themes to the
> extent feasible, so I would think that analysis of this should come from
> telecomm committee for consideration by the whole.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Tobias" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> To: "'TEITAC Telecommunications Subcommittee'"
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:35 AM
> Subject: [teitac-telecom] Paul Michaelis's topic
> Paul just proposed that the Telecom Subcommittee discuss the economic
> making certain features required under 508. As this issue is not limited
> can I recommend that we move this discussion into the relevant Theme,
> Analysis", and therefore move it into the entire Committee's purview. Is
> Jim Tobias
> Inclusive Technologies
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> +1 732.441.0831 voice/tty
> skype jimtobias
> +1 908.907.2387 mobile