Thread Subject: Re: todays question

Note

This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.

From: Debbie Cook
Date: Thu, Jan 11 2007 4:55 PM

I think that providing alternative formats is an accommodation
responsibility of the gency. And, I think there re types of requests for
alternte formats which may go beyond htose we traditionally think of
particularly when it ocmes to cognitive accommodation. But, having said all
that, I do believe the manufacturer has the obligation to create
environments where alternative formats can be readily produced. So I think a
requirement more that that for text books where the manufacturer has to
provide digital formats is more appropriate and probably more likely to go
through than expecting every manufacturer to produce the variants of
alternative format that might be requested.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Brett" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "TEITAC documentation and technical support subcommittee"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [teitac-documentation] todays question


I agree that the standard should explicitly state that the manufacturer pays
for the alternate format.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dawn Wilcox
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:35 PM
Subject: [teitac-documentation] todays question


I interpret 1194.41 (a) to mean the manufacturer provides it and pays for
it. but we could make it more obvious by adding - the manufacturer pays for
and the agency requests alternate formats. Dawn Wilcox CCLVI



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WebAIM is an initiative of:
Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) Utah State University