Thread Subject: Re: default tab on the wiki

Note

This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Tue, Oct 17 2006 8:05 AM

Someone suggested putting summary, resource or consensus stuff at the top of
a page with a running discussion on the bottom below a "=DISCUSSION="
heading.


Gregg

-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b


> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of
> Bailey Bruce
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:53 AM
> To: TEITAC Communications Task Force
> Subject: Re: [teitac-tools] default tab on the wiki
>
> > At least on a discussion page the text looks less authoritative --
> > it's clearly a bunch of opinions.
>
> Do you have any examples of this put to practice? Perhaps a
> wikipedia discussion page? Does the search facility return
> hits on discussion pages? From what I can tell, the media
> Wiki Talk: pages get their formatting because of the
> understanding among users. The mechanics of Editing on the
> Talk: pages is exactly the same as the main article pages.
> (Someone please correct me if I am wrong here!) If Jared
> just make the Discussion tab the default tab, nothing has
> changed but one more-or-less arbitrary text label! It
> doesn't solve the challenge of promoting contributions.
>
> I agree with Jessica that putting comments in the discussion
> tab hides them, which is why you want the discuss tab to be
> the default. I do not understand the problem with promoting
> a proactive of having less formal areas of the main pages.
>
>

WebAIM is an initiative of:
Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) Utah State University