Thread Subject: Re: default tab on the wiki
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jim Tobias
Date: Tue, Oct 17 2006 12:30 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: default tab on the wiki"
- Previous message in thread: Andi Snow-Weaver: "Re: default tab on the wiki"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
again, it's not the technology that does this. it's the fact that it's
labeled a discussion page and seeded with a discussion. the article tab
looks like an article for the same reason.
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bailey Bruce [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:53 AM
> To: TEITAC Communications Task Force
> Subject: Re: [teitac-tools] default tab on the wiki
> > At least on a discussion page the text looks less authoritative --
> > it's clearly a bunch of opinions.
> Do you have any examples of this put to practice? Perhaps a
> wikipedia discussion page? Does the search facility return
> hits on discussion pages? From what I can tell, the media
> Wiki Talk: pages get their formatting because of the
> understanding among users. The mechanics of Editing on the
> Talk: pages is exactly the same as the main article pages.
> (Someone please correct me if I am wrong here!) If Jared
> just make the Discussion tab the default tab, nothing has
> changed but one more-or-less arbitrary text label! It
> doesn't solve the challenge of promoting contributions.
> I agree with Jessica that putting comments in the discussion
> tab hides them, which is why you want the discuss tab to be
> the default. I do not understand the problem with promoting
> a proactive of having less formal areas of the main pages.