Thread Subject: Re: I'd like to propose
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jagbell
Date: Tue, Feb 06 2007 6:25 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Tom Brett: "Re: I'd like to propose"
- Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: I'd like to propose"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Can we also add that they must be hearing aid compatible?
Best,
Janice
On Feb 6, 2007, at 1:29 AM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> Interesting langauge. Seems to capture all the aspects in one
> sentence. Need to get interoperability in there someplace
> (currently different sectors and companies want to use different
> standards (without translation) so you can't make a call from end
> to end except with some people. Also have a bit of trouble
> figuring out what both refers to. But this is a good start at
> getting at the essence.
>
>
>
> We were talking with satellite phone people and they were worried
> that they couldn’t handle the video part. Any ideas how to limit
> this for now when it isn't practical but not forever when it
> becomes practical?
>
>
>
>
> Gregg
> -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:teitac-telecom-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Tom Brett
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 1:22 PM
> To: TEITAC Telecommunications Subcommittee
> Subject: [teitac-telecom] I'd like to propose
>
> All telecom systems and devices must permit both direct, captioned,
> and relayed text and video, including integration with voice
> communication". ***
>
>
>
> From Jim Tobias
>
>
>
> Tom Brett
>
>
>
>
>
>
- Next message in Thread: Tom Brett: "Re: I'd like to propose"
- Previous message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: I'd like to propose"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
