Thread Subject: Re: about the word usable
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Whitney Quesenbery
Date: Wed, Feb 14 2007 3:15 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: about the word usable"
- Previous message in thread: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC: "Re: about the word usable"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
At 02:57 PM 2/14/2007, Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC wrote:
>That is, we ask the question can a person, regardless of
>ability, _use_ the _function_ of the electronic information or
>electronic technology? To me, this is access. It doesn't mean that is
>necessary very usable, the use could be difficult, but specifically it
>should be possible.
A group I worked with once came up with the formulation that
access + usability = accessibility
I know this is not the usual meaning of the word - this was a group trying
to work through the very issue that Norman is talking about and clarifying
for themselves the different considerations.
Whitney
Whitney Quesenbery
Whitney Interactive Design
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
phone: 908-638-5467
mobile: 908-328-5959
www.WQusability.com
www.usabilityprofessionals.org
"Warning: Objects in the calendar are closer than they appear."
- Next message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: about the word usable"
- Previous message in Thread: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC: "Re: about the word usable"