Thread Subject: Re: Thought on sevices
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Truesdell Nick
Date: Wed, Feb 21 2007 6:55 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: terry.weaver@gsa.gov: "Re: Thought on sevices"
- Previous message in thread: David Poehlman: "Re: Thought on sevices"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
As I noted on the conference call yesterday a great majority of services
actually have embedded EIT deliverables. Currently all of these
deliverables would be required to conform to the respective provisions.
In some case this is obvious. (such as where the service is for software
or web development). In other cases it is not as immediately clear.
Referencing the example of a service for use of CPU clock cycles, the
actual processing time itself may not have any 508 implications but
perhaps the service comes with a web interface where a user would upload
a binary job to be processed.
Before breaking out a separate category for services I think care should
be taken to ensure that the items we are looking to address are not
already covered elsewhere.
Nick Truesdell
Information Technology Accessibility Center - ITAC
Information Resources Accessibility Program - IRAP
Desk: 202-283-5536
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = <mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
- Next message in Thread: terry.weaver@gsa.gov: "Re: Thought on sevices"
- Previous message in Thread: David Poehlman: "Re: Thought on sevices"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
