Thread Subject: Re: Servers and other hardware
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: terry.weaver@gsa.gov
Date: Wed, Feb 21 2007 3:10 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Servers and other hardware"
- Previous message in thread: Thomas Albin: "Re: Servers and other hardware"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
The back office exemption is a location-based exclusion that only the
purchasing Federal agency could claim. It was never intended to address a
class of equipment. The premise was that if a server or a router was to
be located in a space that had physical limitations (eg., a wiring
closet), then the agency could claim this exemption only for the hardware
and software that must be run only from that location. If it was on a
network and the software was to be run remotely, then there wasn't a valid
claim for using the exemption for the software component.
"Thomas Albin" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent by: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
02/21/2007 04:26 PM
Please respond to
"TEITAC desktop/portable (hardware) subcommittee"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To
"TEITAC desktop/portable (hardware) subcommittee"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
cc
Subject
Re: [teitac-hardware] Servers and other hardware
Hi Gina,
Does this mean that you want to do away with the "back room" exclusion?
Tom Albin
On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Regina Caldanaro wrote:
We've unofficially renamed ourselves "hardware" but the only discussion
<snip>
- Next message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Servers and other hardware"
- Previous message in Thread: Thomas Albin: "Re: Servers and other hardware"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
