Thread Subject: Re: 22(l) and 22(m) Scripts, applets,and plug-ins

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Wed, Feb 21 2007 11:05 PM

• Return to this mailing list's archives
• View all messages in this thread
• Next message in thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: 22(l) and 22(m) Scripts, applets,and plug-ins"
• Previous message in thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: 22(l) and 22(m) Scripts, applets,and plug-ins"
• Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date

thanks


Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> Of Andi Snow-Weaver
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:51 AM
> To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] 22(l) and 22(m) Scripts,
> applets, and plug-ins
>
> Gregg,
>
> I think it would have to be both.
>
> Andi
>
>
>
>
>
> "Gregg
>
> Vanderheiden"
>
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> To
> u> "'TEITAC Web/Software
>
> Sent by: Subcommittee'"
>
> teitac-websoftwar
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>
> itac.org
> cc
>
>
>
> Subject
> 02/20/2007 10:28 Re:
> [teitac-websoftware] 22(l) and
> AM 22(m) Scripts,
> applets, and
> plug-ins
>
>
>
> Please respond
>
> to
> Web/Software
>
> Subcommittee
>
> <teitac-websoftwa
>
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>
> g>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Did you mean both as requirements or "do one or the other"
> "if A do B. if C do D"
>
>
> Gregg
> -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> > From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> Snow-Weaver Web/Software Subcommittee
> (m) Scripts,
> is not good enough for
> 4.1.2. What
> funcitonal text and added in
> >
> <Allen.Hoffman@dh
> by: "TEITAC Web/Software
> teitac-websoftwar
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Subject
> 22(l) and
> and
> Please respond
> Subcommittee
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> assessment, but what will help is a clear and "plug-ins".
> All of these
> 202-447-0303
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> Subcommittee applets,and concern over the homogenious with
> meet a different test.
> encountered
> worth to explain
> plausible
> notion web developers win-win must
> determined and
> items is available to user
> have global
> testable; take away its testability for the sake of the the
> Federal level is designed to someone can clearly show hard to
> prove = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> recommendation for 22(l) scripts and 22 (m) applets and plug-ins.
> applets and
> determine whether this is the case, Jim Thatcher and mapping
> of all of the 1194.21 requirements to WCAG [1].
> Applications shall not disrupt or disable activated that are
> identified as accessibility documented according to activated
> features where the manufacturer of the operating system and
> is developer.
> mean we
> >
> provided that moves among interactive interface The focus
> shall be programmatically focus and focus changes.
> content,
> 1194.21(f) Textual information shall be provided through
> functions for displaying text. The minimum available is text
> content, text input really an issue for applets proposal for
> an not override user selected contrast and attributes.
> standard
> >
> entering and exiting applet or plug-in content with the as
> identified in the mapping table, most address. But we can't
> go take WCAG recommend adding the Comments?
> >
> > [2]
> http://teitac.org/wiki/Web_and_Software:_Web_Gaps#Focus_Indicator
> > [3]
> > http://teitac.org/wiki/Web_and_Software:_Web_provisions#22.28l
> > .29_.26_22
> http://list.teitac.org/mailman/listinfo/teitac-websoftware.
> >

• Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: 22(l) and 22(m) Scripts, applets,and plug-ins"
• Previous message in Thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: 22(l) and 22(m) Scripts, applets,and plug-ins"