Thread Subject: Re: Cognitive recommendations -configurable userinterfaces
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Smith, Jamie
Date: Fri, Feb 23 2007 3:20 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: David Poehlman: "Re: Cognitive recommendations -configurable userinterfaces"
- Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Cognitive recommendations -configurableuserinterfaces"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Didn't think in the reverse... I a web person, and assist with application as best practices and helping to find users that will test applications. I usually find applications that need something like this and don't have it.
There are some applications that would not need to use this technique at all. Is there some way in the wording to make sure the technique is needed? <sigh> This is where user testing is often of benefit.
- Next message in Thread: David Poehlman: "Re: Cognitive recommendations -configurable userinterfaces"
- Previous message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Cognitive recommendations -configurableuserinterfaces"