Thread Subject: Re: 1194.23(k)(2)

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Fri, Mar 09 2007 11:25 PM

• Return to this mailing list's archives
• View all messages in this thread
• Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: 1194.23(k)(2)"
• Previous message in thread: Randy Marsden: "Re: 1194.23(k)(2)"
• Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date

I would concur. From talking to the Access board some time ago - that was
the intent. (and if you look at the sentence carefully that is the only way
you can interpret it (or else you end up with "no tight twisting of the
wrist" which makes no sense. So "tight" must modify grasping only and not
all three items. SO putting it at the end doesn't change the meaning and
does make it clearer and easier to read properly.


Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of
> Randy Marsden
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:05 PM
> To: TEITAC desktop/portable (hardware) subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-hardware] 1194.23(k)(2)
>
> If that is the case, then the clause would be weakened. It
> would mean that it's OK to require pinching, just not tight
> pinching. I don't think that was the original intent. But
> regardless of the original intent, many people can't pinch or
> twist their wrist - lightly or tightly. I support the change
> of putting "tight grasping" at the end of the list.
> ------------------------------------------------
> Randy Marsden
> President & CEO, Madentec Limited
> ATIA Global Policy Chair
>
> 780-450-8926 ext. 223
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>
>
> > From: "Debbie Cook" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> > Reply-To: "TEITAC desktop/portable (hardware) subcommittee"
> > < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:26:39 -0800
> > To: "TEITAC desktop/portable (hardware) subcommittee"
> > < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> > Subject: Re: [teitac-hardware] 1194.23(k)(2)
> >
> > I don't support the proposed change. I believe "tight"
> applies to all
> > of the actions. No tight gripping, no tight grasping etc.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Thomas Albin" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> > To: "TEITAC desktop/portable (hardware) subcommittee"
> > < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 1:22 PM
> > Subject: [teitac-hardware] 1194.23(k)(2)
> >
> >
> > Sorry to be such a broken record on this, but I still don't
> understand
> > whether or not a decision was made regarding the
> recommendation to the
> > committee regarding 1194.23(k)(2). It was originally proposed to
> > leave the language as currently written in 508, e.g.
> "...and shall not
> > require tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist" . I
> > thought that I heard a decision to re- word this as "...and
> shall not
> > require pinching, twisting of the
> > wrist or tight grasping"? Was a decision made regarding this?
> > Tom Albin
> >
> >
> >
> >

• Next message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: 1194.23(k)(2)"
• Previous message in Thread: Randy Marsden: "Re: 1194.23(k)(2)"