Thread Subject: Re: 24(e) - simplified version
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Hoffman, Allen
Date: Mon, Mar 12 2007 10:45 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: None
- Previous message in thread: Karen Peltz Strauss: "Re: 24(e) - simplified version"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
I think the critical part of the 24c and 24e discussion once we nail
down the meaning, is to identify what we are recommending be changed
from what is in place now, and why.
Allen Hoffman -- 202-447-0303
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Karen Peltz
Strauss
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 1:40 PM
To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-video] 24(e) - simplified version
Yes, the actual captioning requirement is at 1194.24(c).
Karen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "'TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee'" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [teitac-video] 24(e) - simplified version
> Ok
>
> I note that this doesn't require that they be there. I presume that is
> covered in another provision?
>
>
> Gregg
> -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of
>> Karen Peltz Strauss
>> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:43 AM
>> To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
>> Subject: Re: [teitac-video] 24(e) - simplified version
>>
>> In response to Jessica's concern (which I noticed as well),
>> why not simplify it even more then - as follows?
>>
>> 24(e) At the time of playback, captions and/or audio descriptions
must
>> > be either (a) capable of being turned on and off ("closed"), or (b)
>> > visible or audible to all users ("open").
>>
>> Karen
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jessica M. Brodey" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>> To: "'TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee'"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: [teitac-video] 24(e) - simplified version
>>
>>
>> >I like the format, and it fixes the grammatical problem. Does it
>> > inadvertently create a preference for closed over open
>> (i.e, open is only
>> > acceptable if closed is not available)?
>> >
>> > Jessica
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>> > [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andrew
>> > Kirkpatrick
>> > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:24 AM
>> > To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
>> > Subject: [teitac-video] 24(e) - simplified version
>> >
>> > I've tried to capture the issues that we've been talking
>> about AND make
>> > the standard more readable and understandable. This
>> included removing
>> > the text referring to individuals and the resulting need for the
>> > reference to groups. See what you think:
>> >
>> > >
>> > AWK
>> >
>> >
>> > Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> >
>> > Corporate Accessibility Engineering Lead
>> >
>> > Adobe Systems
>> >
>> > = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>> >
>> >
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Peltz Strauss: "Re: 24(e) - simplified version"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
