Thread Subject: Re: Final? draft of 1194.41a, b,and c (was discussion of who pays for alternate format)
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Tue, Mar 20 2007 1:20 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: None
- Previous message in thread: Lybarger, Barbara (MOD): "Re: Final? draft of 1194.41a, b,and c (was discussion of who pays for alternate format)"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
In WCAG we have talked about a mechanism available from the inaccessible
version. The concern being that often the URI of the inaccessible doc is
sent in an email etc and that there isn't a way to get to the accessible
version from the inaccessible version if you don't know the unknown page
that references both.
Some interesting techniques for this too.
Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On
> Behalf Of Baker, Robert C.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:39 AM
> To: TEITAC documentation and technical support subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-documentation] Final? draft of 1194.41a,
> b,and c (was discussion of who pays for alternate format)
>
> Greg raises a good point. Accessible formats of
> non-accessible content
> should be readily accessible within close proximity of the
> original content when published on a web page.
>
>
>
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Lybarger, Barbara (MOD): "Re: Final? draft of 1194.41a, b,and c (was discussion of who pays for alternate format)"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
