Thread Subject: Re: teitac-subparta Digest, Vol 6, Issue 68

Note

This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.

From: Hoffman, Allen
Date: Wed, Mar 21 2007 4:25 AM

All:
As someone who has struggled with the idea of finding the perfect
"pecking order" to complete evaluations to include Section 508
compliance, I am not convinced we are really able to do so at this time.

I believe that this entire topic of "best meets" and attempts to lay a
path to identifying the specific evaluation "pecking order" is beyond
the scope of the "standard" per se. If we back up and focus on
recommending several methods that work in various situations, the
Access-Board and fAR implementers may be able to craft specifically
scoped language to include such methodologies more effectively than we.



Respectfully
Allen Hoffman -- 202-447-0303

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Baker,
Robert C.
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 7:13 AM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [teitac-subparta] teitac-subparta Digest, Vol 6, Issue 68

The FAR does not provide any direction on a "decision tree," "priority
scoring", or other type of "preferential rating scheme" that holds any
mandatory business or technical requirement over another.

At SSA





Thanks,
Robert

WebAIM is an initiative of:
Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) Utah State University