Thread Subject: Re: Telecommunications Working Group- Draft 1Template for 508 in WORD

Note

This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.

From: Michaelis, Paul R. (Paul)
Date: Sat, Mar 24 2007 4:45 PM

Regarding the reference to "PSTN" versus "IP" in many of the proposed
requirements, I agree that IP telephones should be treated differently
but am concerned that describing the non-IP systems as "PSTN" will
create a lot of confusion.



The "PSTN" is the Public Switched Telephone Network. If asked to
describe a PSTN telephony endpoint, I imagine that most telecom
specialists would say it was an analog device that complies with the FCC
regulations that govern residential telephones. If we use this
definition, I can't remember the last time I've seen a government
procurement of telecom equipment that falls into this category.



There are at least three different categories of non-IP wired telephones
in common use today:



Residential analog. (This is what most folks would classify as a "PSTN
phone.")



Enterprise analog. (The distinction between these phones and
residential analog sets is that the enterprise sets connect to the PSTN
via a PBX or switch that is owned by the enterprise. An important
electrical distinction is that, unlike enterprise analog telephones,
residential telephones are required to do "automatic loop length
compensation" to account for distance-related differences in electrical
resistance and capacitance in the line between the phone and the
associated central office. Another important distinction is that many
enterprise analog solutions are actually hybrid analog/digital sets.
The audio stream is carried as traditional analog, supplemented by
digital signaling that, for example, controls the phone's display.)



Enterprise digital. (This is what is purchased in the vast majority of
non-IP wired telephony procurements by the government. All audio
transmissions entering or leaving the phone are digitally encoded,
typically using the G.711 algorithm that I described in a previous
message. Signaling and call control is also digital, typically using
protocols that are proprietary to the individual manufacturers.)



Wired residential analog systems, wired enterprise analog systems, and
wired enterprise digital systems are able to transmit Baudot TTY signals
with 100% reliability. IP telephony is different.



Depending on network characteristics, the mechanisms that are used in
order to transport voice signals within IP networks are not always
suitable for transporting Baudot TTY tones. Common sources of
impairment include packet loss and the use of voice-optimized audio
compression algorithms, such as G.729. For this reason, a traditional
TTY device used in conjunction with an IP phone (for example, via an
acoustic coupler) is not always going to be reliable.



The good news is that, although not yet in common use, there are
international standards that describe how to transport text and Baudot
tones reliably on IP networks. In general, these techniques do not use
the same audio encoding and transmission mechanisms that are used for
voice. I agree completely that the availability of these techniques,
coupled with the inherent unreliability of Baudot TTY transmissions via
the "voice channels" of IP telephone networks, makes it essential that
we treat IP telephony as a special case in the Section 508 refresh.



Getting back to the original topic of my message... We need a term
other than PSTN to describe non-IP wired telephony. Ideally, it should
be a term or description that would make sense to someone who is not
knowledgeable about telephone engineering. To start the ball rolling, I
suggest "wired analog and wired non-IP digital" as a substitute for
PSTN. (I deliberately use the word "wired" because wireless devices
have special characteristics that may need to be addressed separately.)



-- Paul Michaelis






_____

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 2:02 PM
To: 'Brooner Mary-AMB004'; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ;
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; 'Takemura, Michael'; 'Karen Peltz Strauss'; 'Lori
McGarry'; Michaelis, Paul R. (Paul); = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; 'Debbie Cook';
'Fred Lucas'; 'Jasionowski, Tony'; 'Brett, Thomas F'
Cc: 'Creagan Tim'; 'Brenda Battat'; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; 'Jim
Tobias'
Subject: RE: Telecommunications Working Group- Draft 1 Template for 508
in WORD



Hi Mary,



I just added my notes to the draft that you circulated from DIANE.
I made all my comments in blue so they are easy to find.



I also included a copy with the changes marked with double curly
brackets for those whose screen readers don't announce color changes.





As I mentioned, I can be on the Telecom Call this week and next due to
break and labwork.




Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.






_____


From: Brooner Mary-AMB004 [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:51 AM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ;
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; Takemura, Michael; Karen Peltz Strauss; Lori McGarry;
Gregg Vanderheiden; Michaelis, Paul R. (Paul); = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ;
Debbie Cook; Fred Lucas; Gregg Vanderheiden; Jasionowski, Tony; Brett,
Thomas F
Cc: Creagan Tim; Brenda Battat; = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; Jim
Tobias
Subject: Telecommunications Working Group- Draft 1 Template for
508 in WORD

All -



The committee made a request in this week's meeting for me to
circulate our draft template in WORD as it is the medium most are
familiar with. So, this is Draft 1 which was mostly prepared by Diane
Golden. Thank you, DIANE.



Gregg VanderHeiden has a draft with lots of edits. It is on the
Wiki for our subcommittee. I would ask Gregg, if possible to circulate
his contribution in WORD to this group also.



This allows folks to study the document and to edit it. I would
ask, if you want to make editting contributions that you copy the
template, make your edits and identify in the Subject line that it is an
edit.



Thanks, Mary Brooner

WebAIM is an initiative of:
Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) Utah State University