Thread Subject: Re: Split 21 c into to provisions
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Sun, Mar 25 2007 8:45 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Split 21 c into to provisions"
- Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Split 21 c into to provisions"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Gregg,
I'd like to see specific language that you're proposing. You are
suggesting that it would be an either/or situation still? What if one
application does both, supports AT for most things but supplements some
areas of the app with direct access - does that fit in still?
AWK
- Next message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Split 21 c into to provisions"
- Previous message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Split 21 c into to provisions"