Thread Subject: Allen's proposal for a new section on content
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Andi Snow-Weaver
Date: Fri, Mar 30 2007 1:20 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Allen's proposal for a new section oncontent"
- Previous message in thread: None
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Please carefully review Allen's proposal on content before next week. [1]
As I said yesterday in the meeting, I added a phrase to the beginning of
each one to cover a concern that was raised about applicability; that is,
you only have to provide an encoding mechanism for table headers if the
content format supports data tables.
I provided some comments and questions on the wiki "discuss" page. [2] Feel
free to add your comments to the wiki or to post them here on the mailing
list and we will summarize before next week's call.
[1]
http://teitac.org/wiki/Web_and_Software:content#Add_a_new_section_to_508_.281194.27.3F.29
[2] http://teitac.org/wiki/Talk:Web_and_Software:content
Andi
- Next message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Allen's proposal for a new section oncontent"
- Previous message in Thread: None