Thread Subject: Re: more "content"
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Tom Brett
Date: Thu, May 10 2007 1:55 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: None
- Previous message in thread: Tom Brett: "Re: more "content""
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Whitney will be doing a presentation on the subject of usability. Below is
the relevant information.
Theme: Usability of the Standards
(http://teitac.org/wiki/Theme:Usability_of_the_Standards)
Date: 05/18/07
Time: 1:00 - 2:30
Tel # 888-566-6586 Access Code: 57796#
Fed Rcc710540 ..
Tom Brett
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Meier,
Christine
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 3:37 PM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] more "content"
My thoughts exactly -- I can envision developers at my doorstep saying,
"What does that mean?" (Although they would be much more blunt).
Chris Meier
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kirkpatrick
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 3:33 PM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] more "content"
> > "Any sequence of bytes with associated metadata that causes
> it to be
> > interpreted, by specification, as being fit to render for
> the purpose
> > of conveying information."
My problem with this language is that it may not be easy for humanoid
life forms to understand it and that it doesn't help clarify where a
developer or content provider might need to look to content standards vs
web or software standards.
AWK
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Tom Brett: "Re: more "content""
WebAIM is an initiative of:
