Thread Subject: Re: GENERAL WG-ReorgProposal-FORMAT2-5-17-07.doc
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Fri, May 18 2007 11:25 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: GENERAL WG-ReorgProposal-FORMAT2-5-17-07.doc"
- Previous message in thread: Bailey Bruce: "Re: GENERAL WG-ReorgProposal-FORMAT2-5-17-07.doc"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Comments:
1) Why does #4 reference documentation? It seems like documentation can
refer from #7 to #4 on its own.
2) I still don't know what a "content format" is. We need a lot more
clarity in this area.
3) I really like the organization of the hardware requirements in #2.
I'd be in favor of moving 1194.24 a and b into the hardward group's
domain and it would fit well here, although there are software decoders
for captioning also...
AWK
- Next message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: GENERAL WG-ReorgProposal-FORMAT2-5-17-07.doc"
- Previous message in Thread: Bailey Bruce: "Re: GENERAL WG-ReorgProposal-FORMAT2-5-17-07.doc"