Thread Subject: Re: AT Definition
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: jagbell
Date: Wed, May 30 2007 8:30 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Diane Golden: "Re: AT Definition"
- Previous message in thread: Diane Golden: "AT Definition"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
I am dissenting.:)
On May 30, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Diane Golden wrote:
> Per all the discussion on AT definition, I think the best we can do
> is leave
> the current definition as is (there seems to be no dissent on what
> is there)
> and I'll add a note at the end that says it was suggested that a
> list of AT
> be included but there was no consensus on that addition. Alternative
> suggestions were to reference outside lists, like CAP and Natl
> Public AT web
> site, and/or ask federal agencies to identify AT they use. That
> way we
> provide all the info to the TEITAC as a whole for action at the July
> meeting.
>
> In a separate email, I will send out information on the definition
> of "E&IT"
> and "Product" along with the discussion from the plenary meeting on
> those
> terms.
>
> Diane
>
>
- Next message in Thread: Diane Golden: "Re: AT Definition"
- Previous message in Thread: Diane Golden: "AT Definition"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
