Thread Subject: Re: Standard ports language
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Thomas Albin
Date: Fri, Jun 01 2007 8:10 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Standard ports language"
- Previous message in thread: Jim Tobias: "Standard ports language"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Hi Jim,
Doesn't your suggested wording eliminate any allowance of non-
standard connectors? How about something along the lines of:
Where MULTIPLE input or output connection capabilities, whether wired
or wireless, are provided, AT LEAST ONE OF such connection capabilities
shall comply with publicly available industry standards."
rather than
Where input or output connection capabilities, whether wired or
wireless, are provided, such connection capabilities
shall comply with publicly available industry standards."
Best regards,
Tom Albin
On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:31 AM, Jim Tobias wrote:
> Where input or output connection capabilities, whether wired or
> wireless, are provided, such connection capabilities
> shall comply with publicly available industry standards."
- Next message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Re: Standard ports language"
- Previous message in Thread: Jim Tobias: "Standard ports language"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
