Thread Subject: Functional Performance Critieria
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Sun, Jun 03 2007 7:15 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: None
- Previous message in thread: None
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
One of our first orders of business is to come up with functional
performance criteria edits.
There were two aspects of our new wording that the TEITAC commented on and
wanted us to work on.
1) the phrase FULL USE.
2) The phrase "users' AT"
Since these are two different discussions I will post two separate emails so
we can keep the discussions in separate threads
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
< <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848
DSS Player at <http://tinyurl.com/dho6b> http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
If Attachement is a mail.dat try <http://www.kopf.com.br/winmail/>
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: None