Thread Subject: Re: Bypassing content.
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Barrett, Don
Date: Fri, Jun 08 2007 12:45 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Barrett, Don: "Re: Bypassing content."
- Previous message in thread: Walser, Kate: "Re: Bypassing content."
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
I agree about the issue of the content being a footer. We might just
say something like:
"A mechanism shall be available to bypass blocks of content that are
repeated on multiple Web pages, except where such content constitutes
the bottom end of the web page."
Don Barrett
Section 508 Coordinator
U.S. Department of Education
(202)-205-8245
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Sean
Hayes
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 11:49 AM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: [teitac-websoftware] Bypassing content.
I have a slight issue on the testability of : "A mechanism shall be
available to bypass blocks of content that are repeated on multiple Web
pages."
What exactly constitutes a 'block of content'?
Also if the repeated content is the last thing on the page, is a bypass
still necessary? If so, where should it bypass too?
Sean Hayes
Standards and Policy Team
Corporate Accessibility Group
Microsoft
Phone:
mob +44 7977 455002
office +44 117 9719730
- Next message in Thread: Barrett, Don: "Re: Bypassing content."
- Previous message in Thread: Walser, Kate: "Re: Bypassing content."
WebAIM is an initiative of:
