Thread Subject: Re: Bypassing content.
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Hoffman, Allen
Date: Mon, Jun 11 2007 11:15 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Peter Wallack: "Re: Bypassing content."
- Previous message in thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Bypassing content."
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
OK I'm following the logic.
This does highlight that these skip-nav and consistently using structure
to navigate may be indeed separable concepts.
Allen Hoffman -- = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; v: 202-447-0303
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kirkpatrick
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:50 AM
To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Bypassing content.
> Andrew:
> Are you saying method to skip repetitive (or blocks) does not need to
> be visible? it won't meet functional performance criteria if it isn't
> made visible.
An invisible skip link wouldn't satisfy the Functional perfomance
criteria, but neither would any invisible UI control. However,
functionality that allows users to move to different locations using the
semantic structure in a document or application is neither visible or
invisible, so I don't think that the requirement this this be visible is
necessary.
AWK
- Next message in Thread: Peter Wallack: "Re: Bypassing content."
- Previous message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Bypassing content."
WebAIM is an initiative of:
