Thread Subject: Re: "Content" in our subcommittee
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Brett, Thomas F
Date: Fri, Oct 27 2006 5:25 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Andi Snow-Weaver: "Re: "Content" in our subcommittee"
- Previous message in thread: Peter Korn: "Re: "Content" in our subcommittee"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
>>If I remember correctly, they had gotten a lot of questions about
whether
>>documents attached to email, like a Word file with an image, was
covered by
>>508 and if so, did they require some other sort of technical solution.
As one of the individuals that has presented this question to the Access
Board, I'd like to say that email is becoming more and more of a vehicle
in which information is gather and information is disseminated. Either
as an attachment or embedded in the email, forms and data are
transmitted thru email systems. People using assistive technology may
not be able to access this information. In addition to Word files,
which are not necessarily accessible, PDF, TIFF, JPG, GIF files are also
transmitted via email.
Tom Brett,
Section 508 Coordinator
US Office of Personnel Management
Rm 6H34A
2026061206 (v)
2026062582 (tty)
Disabled does not mean Unable
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jim
Tobias
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:15 AM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Cc: 'Baquis David'; 'Creagan Tim'; 'Bailey Bruce'; 'Capozzi David'
Subject: [teitac-websoftware] "Content" in our subcommittee
Hi,
The Group B wiki page does a great job of pulling out the provisions in
21
and 22 that address content (rather than navigation or operation). But
I'm
not sure if it hits the issue presented to us by the Access Board. If I
remember correctly, they had gotten a lot of questions about whether
documents attached to email, like a Word file with an image, was covered
by
508 and if so, did they require some other sort of technical solution.
1. Am I right in stating your concern, Access Board folks?
2. Is Group B on the right track for that concern?
******
Jim Tobias
Inclusive Technologies
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
+1 732.441.0831 voice/tty
skype jimtobias
+1 908.907.2387 mobile
- Next message in Thread: Andi Snow-Weaver: "Re: "Content" in our subcommittee"
- Previous message in Thread: Peter Korn: "Re: "Content" in our subcommittee"