Thread Subject: Re: Definition of Web Content
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Tue, Jun 26 2007 6:55 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: Definition of Web Content"
- Previous message in thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: Definition of Web Content"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
No, I don't. There will always be hairs to split, particularly between
these two sections. I don't think that keeping them apart makes sense.
AWK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> Of Hoffman, Allen
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:43 AM
> To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Definition of Web Content
>
> I was not aware of that difference, but I suppose either we
> can figure out a way to work through that oddity, or just
> say, yeah, that's how it is do to architecture. Do you have
> a suggestion of how to better address these two architectures?
>
>
>
> Allen Hoffman -- = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; v: 202-447-0303
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> Of Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:34 AM
> To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Definition of Web Content
>
> You said that pdf wasn't because it was shown in a plugin.
> The same is true of svg in ie, but not in firefox.
> Awk
>
>
> ---
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Corporate Accessibility Engineering Lead
>
> Adobe Systems
>
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>
> 617.219.2209
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hoffman, Allen [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 05:29 AM Pacific Standard Time
> To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Definition of Web Content
>
> I think you and i are wrestling with the same questions and
> problems Andrew.
>
> I'm not sure why something "SVG" presented in IE would be
> different than in FireFox, from my earlier definition
> perspective, since both also interpret HTML. I too am trying
> to convince myself of the rationale for not merging
> web/software. I view "web" as requirements for coding
> primarily HTML items, which is a subset of other software and
> content coding systems. This is why I keep raising my
> question like "why is this restricted to "web"? Web and
> software are merging so quickly now that if we are to have a
> line, rather than simply clearly defined requirements and
> applicability, then we need to clearly draw the line so
> people can figure it out.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Allen Hoffman -- = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; v: 202-447-0303
>
>
>
>
- Next message in Thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: Definition of Web Content"
- Previous message in Thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: Definition of Web Content"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
