Thread Subject: Re: rewording of 6.3C #1
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: James Elekes
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 9:45 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: rewording of 6.3C #1"
- Previous message in thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: rewording of 6.3C #1"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Looks good. From our 6/27 discussion, the word "original" placement
both clarifies and gives beter meaning to provision.
James J. Elekes, M.Ed, MPA/CPM
Chairman, Telecommunications/Technologies Committee
U.S. Access Board
At 07:28 AM 6/28/2007, you wrote:
>Per Sean's suggestion on yesterday's telecon, here's a stab at
>rewording 6.3C, #1:
>1. materials containing prerecorded video and no audio or other
>additional time-based content must provide either a separate text
>description of the video or provide an additional audio track to
>convey the informational content of the video.
>1. materials containing prerecorded video and no original audio or
>other additional time-based content must provide either a separate
>text description of the video or provide an additional audio track
>to convey the informational content of the video.
>Note that I just added the word "original" to the first part of the