Thread Subject: rewording of 4.2B
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jasionowski, Tony
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 12:45 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: James Elekes: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
- Previous message in thread: James Elekes: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Jim, Robert,
As I recall only 3 people (Jim, Karen, me) were on the call when we
discussed this and we agreed that there were not enough participants to
conclude that analog should be included?
I might be wrong?
Does anyone else recall this discussion?
Thanks.
Tony Jasionowski
Panasonic
AV Co-Chair
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:27:22 -0500
From: James Elekes < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Subject: Re: [teitac-video] rewording of 4.2B
To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Message-ID:
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Robert,
Issue discussed yesterday's Audio/Video S/C. As noted during
discussion, Section 508 is not only a procurement but, also a
maintenance of purchased technologies requirement. Based on service
life for these technologies, it is quite possible Federal agencies
will continue to have analog technology in daily use far beyond the
implementation of the revised 508 Standards. There was consensus on
the call yesterday that not including any reference to analog may
imply or, could be read that Federal agencies cannot use that which
is not specified.
In light of our conversation, analog was included.
Best, Jim
James J. Elekes, M.Ed, MPA/CPM
Presidential Appointee/Public Member and
Chairman, Telecommunications/Technologies Committee
United States Access Board
888.564.8430 (Direct Voice/Fax)
At 10:58 AM 6/28/2007, you wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7B99D.241B6BFE"
>
>A point of clarification: the sale of analog only televisions in the
>US is illegal. Devices containing tuner must have both analog and
>digital reception capability. The rewrite contained below is
>technically flawed.
>
>Robert Blanchard
>Sony
- Next message in Thread: James Elekes: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
- Previous message in Thread: James Elekes: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"