Thread Subject: Re: rewording of 6.3C #1
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 12:55 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: None
- Previous message in thread: James Elekes: "Re: rewording of 6.3C #1"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Looks good
Needs a good short name though to get people focusing on it right so it
doesn't get misinterpreted
Maybe
Video-only Media
Or
Alternatives for Video-Only Media
Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
_____
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of geoff freed
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 7:29 AM
To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
Subject: [teitac-video] rewording of 6.3C #1
Per Sean's suggestion on yesterday's telecon, here's a stab at rewording
6.3C, #1:
ORIGINAL WORDING:
6.3C:
1. materials containing prerecorded video and no audio or other additional
time-based content must provide either a separate text description of the
video or provide an additional audio track to convey the informational
content of the video.
PROPOSED REWRITE:
6.3C:
1. materials containing prerecorded video and no original audio or other
additional time-based content must provide either a separate text
description of the video or provide an additional audio track to convey the
informational content of the video.
Note that I just added the word "original" to the first part of the
sentence. Comments?
Thanks.
geoff.
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: James Elekes: "Re: rewording of 6.3C #1"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
