Thread Subject: Re: rewording of 4.2B

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Thu, Jun 28 2007 1:10 PM

• Return to this mailing list's archives
• View all messages in this thread
• Next message in thread: Geoff Freed: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
• Previous message in thread: Blanchard, Robert: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
• Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date

Per other email by ???

Analog will be in gov a long time
I would include it.


Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of
> Jasionowski, Tony
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 1:38 PM
> To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> Subject: [teitac-video] rewording of 4.2B
>
> Jim, Robert,
> As I recall only 3 people (Jim, Karen, me) were on the call
> when we discussed this and we agreed that there were not
> enough participants to conclude that analog should be included?
> I might be wrong?
> Does anyone else recall this discussion?
> Thanks.
> Tony Jasionowski
> Panasonic
> AV Co-Chair
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:27:22 -0500
> From: James Elekes < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Subject: Re: [teitac-video] rewording of 4.2B
> To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Message-ID:
>
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Robert,
>
> Issue discussed yesterday's Audio/Video S/C. As noted during
> discussion, Section 508 is not only a procurement but, also a
> maintenance of purchased technologies requirement. Based on service
> life for these technologies, it is quite possible Federal agencies
> will continue to have analog technology in daily use far beyond the
> implementation of the revised 508 Standards. There was consensus on
> the call yesterday that not including any reference to analog may
> imply or, could be read that Federal agencies cannot use that which
> is not specified.
>
> In light of our conversation, analog was included.
>
> Best, Jim
>
> James J. Elekes, M.Ed, MPA/CPM
> Presidential Appointee/Public Member and
> Chairman, Telecommunications/Technologies Committee
> United States Access Board
>
> 888.564.8430 (Direct Voice/Fax)
>
> At 10:58 AM 6/28/2007, you wrote:
> >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7B99D.241B6BFE"
> >
> >A point of clarification: the sale of analog only televisions in the
> >US is illegal. Devices containing tuner must have both analog and
> >digital reception capability. The rewrite contained below is
> >technically flawed.
> >
> >Robert Blanchard
> >Sony
>

• Next message in Thread: Geoff Freed: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
• Previous message in Thread: Blanchard, Robert: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"