Thread Subject: rewording of 4.2B
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jasionowski, Tony
Date: Sat, Jun 30 2007 6:45 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Sean Hayes: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
- Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: rewording of 4.2B"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Ken and all,
Agreed, therefore, as orginally proposed let's resolve 4.2B during next July 11 AV sub. com so others can weigh in here.
AV sub. com. co-chair
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:24:37 -0400
From: "Salaets, Ken" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Subject: Re: [teitac-video] rewording of 4.2B
To: "TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >,
"TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Message-ID: < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Karen, everything is negotiable. :-) That's how processes such as this are steered toward consensus, I appreciate the sentiments you, Jim and others have expressed on this issue, but I also appreciate my industry colleagues' perspectives. It occurs to me that this matter may be out of scope relative to what needs to happen here, i.e., motivating Federal agencies to modernize their inventory to ensure comparable access. Is there another avenue or venue where the Board, advocacy and industry can collaborate to achieve the desired result?
Thanks and a good weekend to all.