Thread Subject: Re: 6.3e
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Whitney Quesenbery
Date: Thu, Jul 26 2007 4:15 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: 6.3e"
- Previous message in thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: 6.3e"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
<html>
<body>
Do we need to be careful about distinguishing between provisions
in:<br><br>
"<b>Section 4. Additional Provisions for Audio-Visual Players or
Displays"</b> <br>
and<br>
"<b>Section 6.2/3 If Audio and/or Video Content"<br><br>
</b>And/or add something here that acknowledges that on a PC, the audio
equivalents can be provided through general AT as it would be for any
other software.<br><br>
W<br><br>
At 10:46 AM 7/26/2007, Shannon Rapuano wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Allen, I understand and agree
with the requirement for providing the audio<br>
equivalents when the multimedia is closed like a DVD player.
However, this<br>
provision does not limit the requirement to those types of
environments.<br>
As written, it would apply to all multimedia content. My concern is
the<br>
scope of the provision is too broad.<br><br>
<br>
shannon<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Shannon Rapuano, IBM Accessibility Center<br>
(727) 494-0782, Tieline: 273-3031<br>
CLP Lotus Notes Application Developer R5<br><br>
<br><br>
- Next message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: 6.3e"
- Previous message in Thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: 6.3e"