Thread Subject: Re: draft def for multimedia
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Thu, Aug 02 2007 8:20 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: draft def for multimedia"
- Previous message in thread: Tom Brett: "Re: draft def for multimedia"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Why do we need to define this awful term? Have we changed something so
that we're now using the word "multimedia" in a standard? If so, where?
Thanks,
AWK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Sean Hayes
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:42 AM
> To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-video] draft def for multimedia
>
> For video and audio on their own the obvious term would be monomedia.
>
> However a slight simplification can be made if we use the
> term media to cover video, audio and video with synchronised audio.
>
> Multimedia as used in this standard includes any content,
> static or interactive which includes concurrent media.
> Examples include (insert format references). Example of
> content which is not considered as "multimedia" for this
> standard are, (insert examples).
>
>
> Sean Hayes
> Incubation Lab
> Accessibility Business Unit
> Microsoft
> Phone:
> mob +44 7977 455002
> office +44 117 9719730
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of
> Hoffman, Allen
> Sent: 02 August 2007 13:45
> To: TEITAC Audio/Video Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-video] draft def for multimedia
>
> All:
>
> Here is a draft proposal for "multimedia" definition.
>
> Multimedia as used in this standard includes any content,
> static or interactive, which includes concurrent
> synchronized audio and visual information. Examples include
> (insert format references). Example of content which is not
> considered as "multimedia" for this standard are, (insert examples).
>
>
> Q: Is independent video or audio considered multimedia? If
> not what term applies to them specifically?
>
>
>
> Allen Hoffman -- = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; v: 202-447-0303
>
- Next message in Thread: Hoffman, Allen: "Re: draft def for multimedia"
- Previous message in Thread: Tom Brett: "Re: draft def for multimedia"