Thread Subject: Re: Requests from Generalforfutureconsiderations
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Debbie Cook
Date: Mon, Oct 30 2006 2:45 PM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Peter Korn: "Re: Requests from General forfuture considerations"
- Previous message in thread: Brett, Thomas F: "Re: Requests from General forfutureconsiderations"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
I don't think the intent was to limit it. I think the intent was to have it
moderated--assurance that people rather than bots were signing up. But as
has been indicated, maybe it's not enough of an issue to worry about.
Other subcomms have also expressed concern though about new people dropping
into the committee during the last thirty days of the work for example. So,
I suspect there will be some discussion of how to manage participation
without excluding anyone.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett, Thomas F" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "TEITAC General Interface Accessibility Subcommittee"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >; "TEITAC Communications Task Force"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Cc: "TEITAC General Interface Accessibility Subcommittee"
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [teitac-general] [teitac-tools] Requests from General
forfutureconsiderations
Limiting future membership in subcommittee[s] would also seem to be in
conflict Federal Advisory Committee Act.
Tom Brett
- Next message in Thread: Peter Korn: "Re: Requests from General forfuture considerations"
- Previous message in Thread: Brett, Thomas F: "Re: Requests from General forfutureconsiderations"
WebAIM is an initiative of:
