Thread Subject: identification and authentication provision
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jim Tobias
Date: Wed, Sep 05 2007 8:05 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC: "Re: identification and authentication provision"
- Previous message in thread: None
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
I think the problem we had with the biometric provision was that it focused
on biometrics rather than the underlying need to have user id and
authentication.
Instead, how about:
"User identification and authentication systems must provide at least one
mode of operation that does not require the presence of a specific
biological characterstic that not all people possess."
******
Jim Tobias
Inclusive Technologies
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
+1 732.441.0831 voice/tty
skype jimtobias
+1 908.907.2387 mobile
- Next message in Thread: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC: "Re: identification and authentication provision"
- Previous message in Thread: None