Thread Subject: Re: identification and authentication provision
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Hoffman, Allen
Date: Thu, Sep 06 2007 5:15 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: None
- Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: identification and authentication provision"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
This one does not.
Allen Hoffman -- = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; v: 202-447-0303
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Gregg
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:33 AM
To: 'TEITAC General Interface Accessibility Subcommittee'
Subject: Re: [teitac-general] identification and authentication
Wow. Have to think about it a bit but at first blush this seems to
it all much more succinctly. Could still have the short name of
IDENTIFICATION to make it easy to find.
> "User identification and authentication systems must provide at least
> one mode of operation that does not require the presence of a specific
> biological characteristic that not all people possess."
Would this allow two biometric measures? Our current one does I
but I think this one might not.
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jim
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 9:00 AM
> To: 'TEITAC General Interface Accessibility Subcommittee'
> Subject: [teitac-general] identification and authentication provision
> I think the problem we had with the biometric provision was that it
> focused on biometrics rather than the underlying need to have user id
> and authentication.
> Instead, how about:
> Jim Tobias
> Inclusive Technologies
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> +1 732.441.0831 voice/tty
> skype jimtobias
> +1 908.907.2387 mobile
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: identification and authentication provision"