Thread Subject: Re: Review of , and questions & concerns with 3Sept07 TEITAC draft
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Jim Allan
Date: Thu, Sep 06 2007 8:15 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Diane Golden: "Re: Review of , and questions & concerns with 3Sept07 TEITAC draft"
- Previous message in thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Review of , and questions & concerns with 3Sept07 TEITAC draft"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Nice work Peter.
A comment on one item...
Peter Corn wrote:
> 3-J – Audio turnoff
> -> We should clarify the situation for web pages: better if the web
> browser had this responsibility, so web pages that played sound didn't
> have to explicitly include a 'turn sound off' button when the browser
> can do this function more universally (less burned on programmers to do
> this once in the browser). Perhaps this could be done in an advisory
> note...?
The browser (user agent) can only turn off sound that it knows about, such
as the <bgsound> element. If the author uses <embed> or <object> to contain
FLASH or media player sounds or some JavaScript to play the sound the
hosting user agent has no "knowledge" or control of what occurs in these
elements.
Jim
- Next message in Thread: Diane Golden: "Re: Review of , and questions & concerns with 3Sept07 TEITAC draft"
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Review of , and questions & concerns with 3Sept07 TEITAC draft"