Thread Subject: Re: Keyboard proposal

From: David Poehlman
Date: Wed, Sep 12 2007 1:55 PM

• Return to this mailing list's archives
• View all messages in this thread
• Next message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Keyboard proposal"
• Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Keyboard proposal"
• Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date

hmm,

can they done via the keyboard? I have seen them both referred to but
think that at least sort of free hand drawing is overcomable but if
these are ops not provided through the keyboard, it needs to be clearer.

On Sep 12, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

Sure

The famous one is watercolor painting.

Also any freehand drawing.


Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> Of David Poehlman
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:36 PM
> To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Keyboard proposal
>
> Ok, Is there an example?
>
> On Sep 12, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>
> The exception covers things where we do not know how to make
> non-time dependent keyboard equivalents.
>
> Basically it is an exception that covers that class of things
> are impossible to do this way.
>
>
> Gregg
> -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On
> Behalf Of David
>> Poehlman
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:39 AM
>> To: TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee
>> Cc: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>> Subject: Re: [teitac-websoftware] Keyboard proposal
>>
>> I know we discussed this at length, but what is the meaning of the
>> exception?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>> To: "'TEITAC Web/Software Subcommittee'"
>> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>> Cc: < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:32 AM
>> Subject: [teitac-websoftware] Keyboard proposal
>>
>>
>> On the keyboard provision
>>
>>
>>
>> We need to limit it to devices that have a Keyboard or keyboard
>> interface.
>>
>> We need to allow that some functions may be from other mechanical
>> buttons.
>>
>> Needs to say Keyboard or keyboard interface so that we
> don't require
>> addition of an interface.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> How about
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Where products have a keyboard or keyboard interface , all
>> functionality of the product operable through the user
> interface must
>> be operable through the keyboard or keyboard interface or other
>> mechanical buttons without requiring specific timings for
> individual
>> keystrokes. The only exception is where the underlying function
>> requires input that depends on the path of the user's
> movement and not
>> just the endpoints.
>>
>>
>>
>> NOTE: A software product that accepts text input would have
>> a "keyboard
>> interface".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This puts the condition up front so it is easy to see (and
>> discard provision
>> if not true)
>>
>> Meets the needs stated above
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Gregg
>>
>> ------------------------
>>
>> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>> Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
>> Director - Trace R & D Center
>> University of Wisconsin-Madison
>> < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848
>>
>> DSS Player at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
>>
>> If Attachement is a mail.dat try <http://www.kopf.com.br/winmail/>
>> http://www.kopf.com.br/winmail/
>>
>> <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>>
>>
>>

• Next message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Keyboard proposal"
• Previous message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: Keyboard proposal"