Thread Subject: Re: Beyond the Calendar
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Andi Snow-Weaver
Date: Wed, Oct 11 2006 6:10 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Bailey Bruce: "Re: Beyond the Calendar"
- Previous message in thread: Andi Snow-Weaver: "Re: Beyond the Calendar"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Bruce,
I think it is important to have a way for people to get on the queue using
only their phones without having to access the Internet. Think of all the
times you participate on the WCAG calls from your cell phone when you are
not online.
Andi
"Bailey Bruce"
<Bailey@Access-Bo
ard.gov> To
Sent by: "TEITAC Communications Task Force"
teitac-tools-boun < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = .o cc
rg
Subject
Re: [teitac-tools] Beyond the
10/11/2006 06:25 Calendar
AM
Please respond to
TEITAC
Communications
Task Force
<teitac-tools@lis
t.teitac.org>
> I would encourage you to read the Zakim manual and ponder the
> wisdom of using it for TEITAC, given who our members are and
> those from the public we hope to recruit. Compared to W3C folks.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
Yes, a bot only a Unix geek could love! Fortunately, only the
chair/scribe need be comfortable with Zakim. Other people can ignore
its presence, it is very unobtrusive. And its use is optional.
I have high hopes for Jared's tool. (No pressure!) Requiring on-line
access during a call does not seem unreasonable. The burden of managing
a call while using the Wiki is harder for an AT user, but that is
already required by RCC. Or maybe if many people are using RCC, that
can work for queue management?
> I propose to not accept new members for the Tools task force.
> If you agree we need to remove the listserv invitation from the wiki.
Seems logical to me, but could we not just mark the page/task force
inactive after the next meeting? I kind of assumed we were only
"chartered" until then.
> Well, I'm having fun; hope you are!
Quite!
- Next message in Thread: Bailey Bruce: "Re: Beyond the Calendar"
- Previous message in Thread: Andi Snow-Weaver: "Re: Beyond the Calendar"