Thread Subject: Re: 2.2-C Audio Connection
Note
This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.
From: Schomburg, Paul
Date: Mon, Oct 29 2007 10:10 AM
- Return to this mailing list's archives
- View all messages in this thread
- Next message in thread: Schomburg, Paul: "Re: 2.2-C Audio Connection"
- Previous message in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: 2.2-C Audio Connection"
- Messages sorted by: Author | Thread | Date
Greg: The way you have worded this section I think it would require all
televisions used in a public area to have a 2.5 or 3.5 mm jack. I
suggest rewording (changing and to OR in (c) or, for clarity new section
(d) as follows:
When products provide auditory output beyond simple tonal feedback or
signaling, one of the following must be true:
(a) Auditory output is available via audio transducer that is designed
to be held up to the ear that meets 2.2-A (Magnetic Coupling), 2.2-B
(Interference with Hearing Device), and 2.2-E (Volume - gain) and
product does not require simultaneous use of keyboard; or
(b) A standard 2.5mm or 3.5mm audio jack at the standard signal levels
used for headphones/headsets is provided or
(c) Product is a not designed to be located in a public location; OR
(d) An adapter from the product's audio output format to a 2.5mm or
3.5mm phone jack is commonly available or available from the
manufacturer.
Rationale: A television is not intended for individual close-up
viewing. Any jack for headphones must be located a distance away from
the screen.
A general rule for the TV viewing distance is that the nearest TV
viewing distance should be limited to approximately twice the screen
width (more precise 1.87 x screen width for a subtended angle of 30
degrees), while the furthest distance being no more than five times the
width of the screen. For details see:
http://www.myhometheater.homestead.com/viewingdistancecalculator.html
Thanks, Paul
- Next message in Thread: Schomburg, Paul: "Re: 2.2-C Audio Connection"
- Previous message in Thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "Re: 2.2-C Audio Connection"