Thread Subject: Re: January Meeting?

Note

This archival content is maintained by WebAIM and NCDAE on behalf of TEITAC and the U.S. Access Board . Additional details on the updates to section 508 and section 255 can be found at the Access Board web site.

From: Gregg Vanderheiden
Date: Mon, Nov 19 2007 2:00 PM


Peter also suggested that if we were going to miss the January date - that
we schedule the January meeting to go all week - and try to just finish is
up.

Hopefully we don't need to do that but I think his thought was (and I think
I agree) that it would be better to work all week than to have another face
to face between Jan and March. We did achieve a lot this week. With our
calls hopefully there won't be that much left for January............


Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf
> Of James Elekes
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:50 PM
> To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ; TEITAC Committee
> Subject: Re: [teitac-committee] January Meeting?
>
> Diane,
>
> At the Friday TEITAC Plenary Session, as Board Liaison from
> the Access Board, I made a proposal to have the Final
> Recommendations delayed until the March 2008 Access Board
> Meeting. The proposal included:
>
> -A full TEITAC Plenary Session in January 2008 (3-4 days as
> necessary to complete all remaining activities).
>
> -Presentation of Final Recommendations on Monday morning,
> March 10th as the Board's 1st Agenda item (to allow TEITAC
> Members to travel later that day for CSPAN.
>
> -Upon my suggestion, Mike and Jim suggested tEITAC hold-off
> until the December 4th or 11th TEITAC teleconference to
> determine whether the extension was necessary.
>
> -A question was raised by Peter (Sun Micro) whether the Final
> Recommendations had to be packaged for presentation. My
> response, "No" as the Board could receive Final
> Recommendations orally at the presentation with a written
> "Executive Summary". The Full TEITAC Report could be made
> available post-presentation once prepared in appropriate formats.
>
> Hope info is helpful. Please forgive any gaps as I was taking
> notes on my BrailleSense while consulting with Board staff
> regarding my proposal.
>
> Best, Jim
>
> James J. Elekes, M.Ed, MPA, CPM
> Presidential Appointee/Public Member and Chairman,
> Telecommunications, Electronic/Information Technologies
> Committee United States Access Board
>
> (O) 888.564.8430
> (E) = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>
>
> At 02:47 PM 11/19/2007, you wrote:
> >Could someone please clarify for me the agenda and
> expectations for the
> > January TEITAC meeting -- if there is to be a
> meeting. I may
> >have missed some discussion, but I'm not sure if TEITAC members are
> >expected to be in DC in January or not. If so, I really
> need details
> >as I have no travel plans made to date.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Diane Golden
> >
> >


WebAIM is an initiative of:
Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) Utah State University